Showing posts with label Moderna. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Moderna. Show all posts

Tuesday, 31 January 2023

Moderna refused China request to reveal vaccine technology

 Moderna has refused to hand over to China the core intellectual property behind the development of its breakthrough Covid-19 vaccine, leading to a collapse in negotiations on its sale there, according to multiple people familiar with the matter. 


Sun Yu in New York, Eleanor Olcott in Hong Kong and Donato Paolo Mancini in London OCTOBER 2 2022 

Montage of a syringe being inserted into a Moderna Covid-19 vial, China’s flag and DNA strands

The mRNA vaccine technology used by Moderna provides longer-lasting and higher levels of protection than tech used by Chinese providers © FT montage: AFP/Getty Images

 Moderna has refused to hand over to China the core intellectual property behind the development of its breakthrough Covid-19 vaccine, leading to a collapse in negotiations on its sale there, according to multiple people familiar with the matter. 

 The Massachusetts-based pharmaceutical company turned down Beijing’s request to hand over the recipe for its messenger RNA vaccine because of commercial and safety concerns, said two people involved in negotiations that took place between 2020 and 2021. 

The vaccine maker says it is still “eager” to sell the product to China. The mRNA vaccine technology used by Moderna and BioNTech/Pfizer provides longer-lasting and higher levels of protection than the inactivated vaccine technology used by Chinese makers. 

Several Chinese pharma companies are racing to develop a homemade mRNA alternative but have struggled with the emergence of more infectious variants. 

 One individual close to the Moderna team in Greater China said the company had “given up” on its previous efforts to access the Chinese market, because of Beijing’s demand that it hand over the technology as a prerequisite for selling into the country. 

 To date, Beijing has offered two routes for foreign Covid-19 vaccine makers to distribute in China, dependent on regulatory approval: carrying out a full technology transfer to a domestic drugmaker or establishing a manufacturing facility in China with a local partner, while keeping control of the underlying technology. 

Moderna was pressed to take the former option. 

 The German group BioNTech has struck a deal with Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical to conduct clinical trials and commercialise its vaccine in 2020, which meant it retained control of the intellectual property. 

Under the partnership, Fosun agreed to provide a factory that would make up to 1bn doses a year. 

 By contrast, the Shanghai-based Everest Medicines group made a deal to access the Canadian biotech company Providence Therapeutics’s mRNA vaccine candidate that involved a full tech transfer. 

 Beijing has not granted either vaccine regulatory approval. 

 The Moderna leadership did not want to hand over the vaccine recipe to a Chinese partner because of the reputational damage if the local partner botched the manufacturing, said two people with knowledge of the matter. 

 Recommended

The Big Read Will ‘open-source’ vaccines narrow the inequality gap exposed by Covid? 

 Moderna has been fiercely protective of its intellectual property around the world, saying handing over patents would do little to address supply constraints. Talks in Italy for a tech transfer to local manufacturing sites have also failed, but Moderna gave the reason that it lacked the capacity to oversee it. 

 China has not approved any mRNA products for therapeutic purposes, and the mass production of this kind of vaccine is more complex than China’s existing inactivated vaccines made by Sinopharm and Sinovac. 

 In recent weeks, Moderna has signalled a willingness to restart talks with China. Its chief medical officer Paul Burton said this month: “We would certainly be very eager to collaborate with China if they felt that there was a need for a vaccine there.” 

 Burton’s comments came days after US president Joe Biden proclaimed the “pandemic is over”, wiping more than $10bn off the market value of the main makers of vaccines, including Moderna. 

 Moderna told the Financial Times: “We are not currently engaged in supply talks with China. We are open to speaking with countries on their supply needs for Covid-19 vaccines.” 

 Industry insiders observed that the company’s willingness to reopen talks with China, the last remaining major economy without an mRNA jab, has been driven by sluggish demand for vaccines in the wealthier countries where it first targeted sales. 

 According to Airfinity, a data firm that monitors vaccine shipments, Moderna has shipped a greater share of its vaccines to high-income countries than the other three major vaccine makers, a strategy that earned it billions of dollars in profit. 

More than 86 per cent of Moderna’s jabs have been delivered to high-income countries, compared with 74 per cent for BioNTech/Pfizer, 63 per cent for Johnson & Johnson and 19 per cent for AstraZeneca. 

 Slowing demand has afflicted all the major coronavirus vaccine makers, but with the Covid-19 jab its only approved product, the pressure on Moderna’s management is particularly acute, according to people familiar with the matter. 

 Additional reporting by Jamie Smyth in New York

https://www.ft.com/content/a481c129-c5aa-4972-84a8-3a45bb000098

Sunday, 2 October 2022

Moderna refused China request to reveal vaccine technology

 Moderna has refused to hand over to China the core intellectual property behind the development of its breakthrough Covid-19 vaccine, leading to a collapse in negotiations on its sale there, according to multiple people familiar with the matter. 


Sun Yu in New York, Eleanor Olcott in Hong Kong and Donato Paolo Mancini in London OCTOBER 2 2022 

Montage of a syringe being inserted into a Moderna Covid-19 vial, China’s flag and DNA strands

The mRNA vaccine technology used by Moderna provides longer-lasting and higher levels of protection than tech used by Chinese providers © FT montage: AFP/Getty Images

 Moderna has refused to hand over to China the core intellectual property behind the development of its breakthrough Covid-19 vaccine, leading to a collapse in negotiations on its sale there, according to multiple people familiar with the matter. 

 The Massachusetts-based pharmaceutical company turned down Beijing’s request to hand over the recipe for its messenger RNA vaccine because of commercial and safety concerns, said two people involved in negotiations that took place between 2020 and 2021. 

The vaccine maker says it is still “eager” to sell the product to China. The mRNA vaccine technology used by Moderna and BioNTech/Pfizer provides longer-lasting and higher levels of protection than the inactivated vaccine technology used by Chinese makers. 

Several Chinese pharma companies are racing to develop a homemade mRNA alternative but have struggled with the emergence of more infectious variants. 

 One individual close to the Moderna team in Greater China said the company had “given up” on its previous efforts to access the Chinese market, because of Beijing’s demand that it hand over the technology as a prerequisite for selling into the country. 

 To date, Beijing has offered two routes for foreign Covid-19 vaccine makers to distribute in China, dependent on regulatory approval: carrying out a full technology transfer to a domestic drugmaker or establishing a manufacturing facility in China with a local partner, while keeping control of the underlying technology. 

Moderna was pressed to take the former option. 

 The German group BioNTech has struck a deal with Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical to conduct clinical trials and commercialise its vaccine in 2020, which meant it retained control of the intellectual property. 

Under the partnership, Fosun agreed to provide a factory that would make up to 1bn doses a year. 

 By contrast, the Shanghai-based Everest Medicines group made a deal to access the Canadian biotech company Providence Therapeutics’s mRNA vaccine candidate that involved a full tech transfer. 

 Beijing has not granted either vaccine regulatory approval. 

 The Moderna leadership did not want to hand over the vaccine recipe to a Chinese partner because of the reputational damage if the local partner botched the manufacturing, said two people with knowledge of the matter. 

 Recommended

The Big Read Will ‘open-source’ vaccines narrow the inequality gap exposed by Covid? 

 Moderna has been fiercely protective of its intellectual property around the world, saying handing over patents would do little to address supply constraints. Talks in Italy for a tech transfer to local manufacturing sites have also failed, but Moderna gave the reason that it lacked the capacity to oversee it. 

 China has not approved any mRNA products for therapeutic purposes, and the mass production of this kind of vaccine is more complex than China’s existing inactivated vaccines made by Sinopharm and Sinovac. 

 In recent weeks, Moderna has signalled a willingness to restart talks with China. Its chief medical officer Paul Burton said this month: “We would certainly be very eager to collaborate with China if they felt that there was a need for a vaccine there.” 

 Burton’s comments came days after US president Joe Biden proclaimed the “pandemic is over”, wiping more than $10bn off the market value of the main makers of vaccines, including Moderna. 

 Moderna told the Financial Times: “We are not currently engaged in supply talks with China. We are open to speaking with countries on their supply needs for Covid-19 vaccines.” 

 Industry insiders observed that the company’s willingness to reopen talks with China, the last remaining major economy without an mRNA jab, has been driven by sluggish demand for vaccines in the wealthier countries where it first targeted sales. 

 According to Airfinity, a data firm that monitors vaccine shipments, Moderna has shipped a greater share of its vaccines to high-income countries than the other three major vaccine makers, a strategy that earned it billions of dollars in profit. 

More than 86 per cent of Moderna’s jabs have been delivered to high-income countries, compared with 74 per cent for BioNTech/Pfizer, 63 per cent for Johnson & Johnson and 19 per cent for AstraZeneca. 

 Slowing demand has afflicted all the major coronavirus vaccine makers, but with the Covid-19 jab its only approved product, the pressure on Moderna’s management is particularly acute, according to people familiar with the matter. 

 Additional reporting by Jamie Smyth in New York

https://www.ft.com/content/a481c129-c5aa-4972-84a8-3a45bb000098

Friday, 11 December 2020

AstraZeneca and Russia’s Sputnik V lab to share data in seeking coronavirus vaccine advances

 MOSCOW — The developers of Russia's Sputnik V vaccine will share science with pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca to explore possible advances against the coronavirus, both sides said Friday, in the first major collaboration of labs that were in the frenzied vaccine hunt.

 and  
December 11, 2020 at 12:45 p.m. EST

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/virus-vaccine-astrazeneca-russia-collaboration/2020/12/11/6481a3f8-3baa-11eb-aad9-8959227280c4_story.html

Anglo-Swedish pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca developed its vaccine in collaboration with the University of Oxford. (Justin Tallis/AFP/Getty Images)

It also is a further sign of the unprecedented pace of vaccine ­research. Efforts are already underway for improvements and ­second-generation formulas, even before the widespread distribution of the first crop of vaccines from labs in the United States, Europe, China and elsewhere.


The research is aimed at testing new vaccine formulas using ­cold viruses, said a statement by the Anglo-Swedish AstraZeneca, which could work in tandem with Russia’s Gamaleya National Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology, whose Sputnik V uses two injections based on vectors of the common-cold virus, or adenovirus.


Live updates: The latest on the pandemic around the world

The AstraZeneca vaccine, created with the University of Oxford, uses a cold virus that typically infects chimpanzees. That teaches the human immune system to block the novel coronavirus.


AstraZeneca “will soon begin exploring within Russia to understand whether two adenovirus-based vaccines can be successfully combined,” the company said.


Russia said AstraZeneca had agreed to explore using a Sputnik V “component” as part of ­efforts to create an improved vaccine.


For Russia — which trumpeted the partnership in tweets from a Sputnik V account — the deal offers a chance to further promote its flagship vaccine, which is still in Phase 3 trials but became available for health-care workers and others this week in Russia. Initial interest at Moscow clinics for the shots, however, appeared limited as many Russians remained wary of the vaccine.


Russia expected a surge for its Sputnik V vaccine. But many skeptics still stayed away.

The potential collaboration also sets up contrasts as wealthy countries snap up the early supplies of the promising vaccines from U.S.-based Moderna and Pfizer, which worked with Germany’s BioNTech. The AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine, which is still awaiting regulatory approval, has been promoted by the company as a “vaccine for the world,” with an eye to affordability and global reach.


Russia says it has orders for 1.2 billion doses from more than 40 countries in Asia, Latin America, Africa, Central Asia, India and other regions.

The AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine, left, and Russia’s Sputnik V vaccine. (Left: John Cairns/University of Oxford/AFP/Getty Images. Right: Olga Maltseva/AFP/Getty Images)

The British government also recently announced that it would begin testing combinations of two technologies, pairing one dose of a viral-vector vaccine like the one from AstraZeneca with a messenger RNA vaccine, the technology used in the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines.

AstraZeneca said in a statement that such combinations “could help unlock synergies in protection and improve vaccine accessibility and could provide an additional approach to help overcome this deadly virus.”


The news comes as setbacks were announced Friday for two Western vaccines, one developed by France’s Sanofi and Britain’s GlaxoSmithKline and the other by Australia’s University of Queensland.


Russian officials said Thursday that Sputnik V’s efficacy is 96.5 percent, compared with 70 percent for the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine.


The British medical journal the Lancet on Tuesday published a peer-reviewed paper on the AstraZeneca vaccine, but questions lingered about how well it worked in people over 55 and about results showing better outcomes with an initial half-dose. Full scientific data on Sputnik V has not been released, but Russia has promised to provide access to all data to any country interested in the vaccine.


“We offered @AstraZeneca to use one of our vectors so they can also have two vectors in their vaccine. AZ confirmed,” the developers of Sputnik V tweeted Friday.


“The new chapter of vaccine cooperation has started today,” another tweet announced. “We made an offer and AstraZeneca accepted it. It all happened here on Twitter!”


Russia’s decision to register and roll out the vaccine before Phase 3 trials were completed was criticized as reckless by some Western scientists. But Russian officials have grown increasingly hostile and defensive at what they see as Western attacks designed to discredit Russia’s vaccine for commercial reasons.


Igor Konashenkov, a Russian military spokesman, on Friday attacked what he called a foreign-funded “information sabotage” effort against Sputnik V from inside and outside Russia.


Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Thursday that the United States and its allies were trying to exploit the pandemic, creating a global vaccine race.


Russia had called for global cooperation to defeat the threat, he said, “but unfortunately, a number of countries, primarily the Americans and their allies, are trying to use this situation in their geopolitical interests, putting their selfish interests above those of all humanity.”


AstraZeneca vaccine details published in Lancet, but questions remain

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov on Friday denounced unspecified “dirty tricks . . . to discredit our vaccine” and told journalists that “there should not be any rivalry on the vaccine market.”

Russia’s Sputnik V vaccine at a clinic in Moscow last week. (Maxim Shipenkov/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock)

Sputnik V’s developers on Friday also offered to share the Russian vaccine with France’s Sanofi and Britain’s GlaxoSmithKline to boost their vaccine’s efficacy.


Sanofi and GSK announced Friday that their vaccine would be delayed until the end of next year after their trial found a low immune response in older adults.


“#Sputnik V is willing to share its technology with Sanofi and GSK to help in developing their next vaccine,” the Russian Direct Investment Fund, backer of Sputnik V, tweeted. “A partnership of different producers is the way of the future.”


So far, 150,000 Russians have been vaccinated with the Sputnik V vaccine, Gamaleya Center Director Alexander Gintsburg said Thursday. Only front-line health workers and teachers qualify to get the shot in mass vaccinations at government health clinics that opened this week. The Russian military is also offering vaccines to service members.


Polling in Russia shows that many Russians remain skeptical about being vaccinated, with anti-vaccine conspiracy theories circulating online, and that some Russians are convinced the coronavirus does not exist. Any collaboration with a major Western drug company could boost Russian government efforts to encourage Russians to get vaccinated.


Clinical trials of a second Russian vaccine, developed by the Vector Center, began Friday.


The global price of the Sputnik V vaccine has been set at about $20 for two shots. Russian developers say the vaccine can be stored at about 18 degrees, making it easier to store and transport than the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, which must be kept at ultracold temperatures. The AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine, however, can be stored long term at ordinary refrigerator temperatures.


Noack reported from Berlin. Carolyn Y. Johnson in Boulder, Colo., and Emily Rauhala in Washington contributed to this report.


Russia’s vaccine volunteers swap stories — and antibody readings — as amateur researchers

Russia unveils coronavirus vaccine ‘Sputnik V,’ claiming breakthrough in global race before final testing complete

Coronavirus: What you need to know


Vaccines: The CDC recommends that everyone age 5 and older get an updated covid booster shot. New federal data shows adults who received the updated shots cut their risk of being hospitalized with covid-19 by 50 percent. Here’s guidance on when you should get the omicron booster and how vaccine efficacy could be affected by your prior infections.

New covid variant: The XBB.1.5 variant is a highly transmissible descendant of omicron that is now estimated to cause about half of new infections in the country. We answered some frequently asked questions about the bivalent booster shots.

Guidance: CDC guidelines have been confusing — if you get covid, here’s how to tell when you’re no longer contagious. We’ve also created a guide to help you decide when to keep wearing face coverings.

Where do things stand? See the latest coronavirus numbers in the U.S. and across the world. In the U.S., pandemic trends have shifted and now White people are more likely to die from covid than Black people. Nearly nine out of 10 covid deaths are people over the age 65.

For the latest news, sign up for our free newsletter.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/virus-vaccine-astrazeneca-russia-collaboration/2020/12/11/6481a3f8-3baa-11eb-aad9-8959227280c4_story.html


Other reads

Most Recent Post

Man charged for borrowing rare Chinese manuscripts from UCLA library, returning fakes

  Suspect Jeffrey Ying allegedly travelled to China after checking works out using several aliases Agence France-Presse Published: 12:11pm, ...

Popular Posts - Last 30 days