Showing posts with label Lithuania. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lithuania. Show all posts

Sunday, 14 August 2022

China Sanctions Lithuanian Minister

Taiwan Denounces China For Sanctioning Lithuanian Minister, Calls It 'bullying Action'

"In response to the egregious and provocative act of Vaiciukeviciute, China decides to adopt sanctions and to suspend all forms of exchange," PRC's FM noted.

 Last Updated: 

Written By

Zaini Majeed

https://www.republicworld.com/world-news/china/taiwan-denounces-china-for-sanctioning-lithuanian-minister-calls-it-bullying-action-articleshow.html


IMAGE: AP

Taiwan on Saturday denounced China for sanctioning Lithuania's Deputy Minister of Transport, Agne Vaiciukeviciute after the Lithuanian delegation made US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi-style Taiwan visit. 

Labelling the move as a "bullying action", Taiwan said that China is indulging in groundless behaviour after minister Vaiciukeviciute arrived in Taipei on August 7 for a five-day tour. Lithuania and Taiwan pledged bolstering ties and future cooperation.

Beijing, however, slammed the Baltic nation for what it described as "undermining mainland's sovereignty and territorial integrity." It reminded the Republic of Lithuania's undertaken obligation to not establish official relations or engage in official contact with Taiwan, and recognise that Taiwan is an inalienable part of the Chinese territory under the 'One China' policy.

"In response to the egregious and provocative act of Vaiciukeviciute, China decides to adopt sanctions on Vaiciukeviciute, to suspend all forms of exchange with the Ministry of Transport and Communications of Lithuania, and to suspend exchange and cooperation with Lithuania in the field of international road transport," PRC's ministry of foreign affairs noted in a statement issued subsequently after Lithuanian minister's visit. 

Lithuania side 'repeatedly breaks promises, which is blatant breach of faith': PRC

After Beijing sanctioned Lithuania's Ministry of Transport and Communications, she expressed regret over the PRC's decision to suspend cooperation with Lithuania in the field of international road transport. "Lithuania chooses to cooperate with countries willing to cooperate with us," Vaiciukeviciute told a news conference in Taipei.

She later iterated that her tour was planned months ahead and that it involved normal bilateral exchanges and cooperation between the two ally nations. Lithuania's Ministry of Transport and Communications was baffled at China's retaliatory measure. 

It is to be noted that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) also resorted to ceasing all the channels of bilateral communications with the Baltic republic's ministry and cooperation on international road transport. 

Lithuanian side "repeatedly breaks its promises, which is a blatant breach of faith," said China's foreign ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin at a presser. 

"China strongly condemns the Lithuanian anti-China forces for their deliberate violation of China's sovereignty and gross interference in China's internal affairs," Wang asserted. 

Ties between Lithuania and China soured since the Baltic nation ignored Beijing's strong objection and repeated dissuasion against maintaining ties with the self-administered island nation and opened the so-called “Taiwanese Representative Office in Lithuania." 

China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian had repeatedly warned Lithuania of 'undisclosed retaliatory measures' for opening the De facto embassy in Vilnius despite the mainland's opposition. 

Zhao had iterated what measures China will take, Lithuania shall “wait and see” when asked by a reporter about China’s response with respect to the development. 

Lijian accused Lithuania of flagrantly violating the One-China principle, and renouncing the political commitment made by Lithuania in the communiqué on the establishment of diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China.





Friday, 12 August 2022

New setback for Beijing - Latvia and Estonia leave China-backed East Europe forum

 Latvia and Estonia say they have left a Chinese-backed forum aimed at boosting relations with ...


Latvia and Estonia leave China-backed East Europe forum in new setback for Beijing

Fri, 12 August 2022 at 3:32 pm

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/latvia-estonia-leave-china-backed-073239413.html


Latvia and Estonia say they have left a Chinese-backed forum aimed at boosting relations with Eastern European countries, in what appears to be a new setback for China's increasingly assertive diplomacy.

The move follows China’s boosting of its relations with Russia, whose invasion of Ukraine is seen as a possible first step in a series of moves against countries that were once part of the Soviet Union. China has refused to criticise Russia and has condemned punishing economic sanctions imposed on Moscow by the West.

Weeks before the invasion, President and Communist Party leader Xi Jinping hosted Russian President Vladimir Putin in Beijing and declared their bilateral relations had “no limits" in a joint statement.

The move also comes after Beijing launched economic and diplomatic retaliation against another Baltic state, Lithuania, in retaliation for its expanded ties with the self-governing island democracy of Taiwan, which China claims as its own territory and threatens to annex by force. China’s increasing assertiveness and recent threatening military exercises near Taiwan have brought a sharp backlash from the US, the EU, Japan, Australia and others.

“In view of the current priorities of Latvian foreign and trade policy, Latvia has decided to cease its participation in the cooperation framework of Central and Eastern European Countries and China," Latvia's Foreign Ministry said in a statement Thursday.

The country “will continue to strive for constructive and pragmatic relations with China both bilaterally, as well as through EU-China cooperation based on mutual benefit, respect for international law, human rights and the international rules-based order," the statement said.

Estonia issued a similar statement, saying it would “continue to work towards constructive and pragmatic relations with China, which includes advancing EU-China relations in line with the rules-based international order and values such as human rights."

“Estonia participated in the cooperation format of Central and Eastern Europe and China from 2012. Estonia has not attended any of the meetings of the format after the summit last February," the statement said.

China set up the forum to strengthen relations with members of the EU as well as Serbia and others, partly to further Xi's signature Belt and Road campaign to build bridges, railways, power plants and other infrastructure across the Eurasian continent.

China originally styled the forum as a “17 plus one" arrangement, but the number of European partners has now fallen to 14. Critics say the forum was an attempt to exploit differences among those states as part of a larger campaign to join with Russia in undermining the current rules-based international order dominated by the US and its allies.

Along with its stance on Ukraine, China has come under strong criticism for firing missiles and sending ships and warplanes off the coast of Taiwan in response to a visit there by U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. China strongly opposes all government-to-government contacts between Taiwan and countries which, like the US, maintain only informal ties with the island in deference to Beijing.

Britain summoned China's ambassador to register its concern over the “increasingly aggressive behavior and rhetoric from Beijing in recent months, which threaten peace and stability in the region,” Foreign Secretary Liz Truss was quoted as saying. “The United Kingdom urges China to resolve any differences by peaceful means, without the threat or use of force or coercion.”

Beijing's threats against Taiwan are a major contributing factor in the deterioration of US-China relations to their lowest level in decades. China has also engaged in a lengthy feud with Australia and its firing of missiles last week drew condemnation from Japan, whose exclusive economic zone includes waters where the projectiles landed.

In another rejection, South Korea on Wednesday said it will make its own decisions about strengthening its defenses against North Korean threats amid Chinese calls that it continue the policies of Seoul’s previous government that refrained from adding more US anti-missile batteries, which are strongly opposed by Beijing.

Asked about the developments, US State Department spokesperson Vedant Patel said “we respect and support Estonia and Latvia’s sovereign decision to no longer participate."

“Estonia and Latvia are important and valued NATO allies and key US partners across a number of issues, including through our strong defense ties, our strong economic ties, as well as the promotion of democracy and human rights," Patel told reporters.

“Over the past year, we’ve seen countries around the world express deep concern about the PRC’s strategic alignment with Russia as well as Beijing’s support for Moscow’s war against Ukraine," Patel said. “There is a growing convergence about the need to approach relations with Beijing with more realism," he said, citing previous comments from Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

Concluding a five-day visit to Taipei on Thursday, Lithuanian Deputy Minister of Transport and Communications Agne Vaiciukeviciute emphasized the importance of economic ties with Taiwan and endorsed a statement issued by the Group of Seven industrialised nations criticising the Chinese military exercises surrounding Taiwan. The European Union issued a similar statement, prompting China to summon the group's ambassadors to register a protest.

“Lithuania is a democracy. Taiwan is our very close friend, and Taiwan is a booming economy," Vaiciukeviciute said.

“Lithuania chooses to cooperate with countries that are willing to cooperate with us. So, Taiwan is one of those countries and they are reliable partners," she said.

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/latvia-estonia-leave-china-backed-073239413.html

Baltic States Abandon Cooperation With China

Baltic States Abandon East European Cooperation With China



(Bloomberg) -- Latvia and Estonia joined Lithuania in abandoning the so-called 16+1 eastern European framework with China, which once threatened to divide the European Union in its relations with the world’s most populous nation.

The format between China and eastern members took shape in 2012 as a platform for Beijing to forge ties with 16 eastern European countries, cooperating on infrastructure and development projects. Greece joined in 2019, making it 17+1 for a time. Critics saw the arrangement as a way for China to exploit EU members who felt overlooked by Brussels.

“Latvia will continue to strive for constructive and pragmatic relations with China both bilaterally, as well as through EU-China cooperation,” the Foreign Ministry in Riga said in a statement on Thursday. Estonia issued a statement with similar wording.

Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Reinsalu late Thursday told public broadcaster ERR “an element” of the decision was due to China’s failure to condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The ministry earlier said that Estonia hadn’t actively participated in the format since last year.

Russia’s invasion triggered a broad re-think in relations with China. But even before the war, enthusiasm for the cooperation mechanism waned as some countries bristled at widening trade balances with China -- and the Asian superpower’s failure to deliver on pledges of billions of dollars in investments.

“We respect and support Estonia and Latvia’s sovereign decision to no longer participate in the 16+1 initiative,” State Department spokesman Vedant Patel told reporters Thursday. Countries have expressed deep concern about China’s strategic alignment with Russia, Patel said, adding that aligning with partners in Europe was a “pillar of this administration’s approach” to China.

In an apparent snub to China, the three Baltic nations sent neither their presidents nor prime ministers to the last in-person summit last year, sending lower-level officials in their stead.

Lithuania, which became embroiled in a dispute with China after allowing Taiwan to set up a representative office, pulled out of the group last year, saying the cooperation wasn’t delivering on its promises.

A delegation led by Lithuania’s deputy transportation minister visited Taiwan this week in the wake of US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s trip there earlier this month. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin pledged Thursday to “act resolutely in response to the egregious provocation of certain individuals in Lithuania.”

Beijing had withdrawn its ambassador to Lithuania, a nation of 2.8 million, and imposed an effective trade ban on the EU member state, reacting to the representative office under the name of Taiwan. China regarded the development as a violation of its sovereignty.

The European Union took China to the World Trade Organization last year over its coercive practices against Lithuania and some exporters from other member states. China’s measures included restrictions on exports to the Baltic nation, and Chinese companies canceled orders from Lithuanian firms.

Latvia sends 162 million euros ($167 million) in exports, mainly wood and timber products to China, while Estonia’s sales to the Asian country amount to 195 million euros.

(Updates with Estonian foreign minister comments in fourth paragraph.)

https://uk.yahoo.com/finance/news/baltic-states-abandon-east-european-024419042.html

Sunday, 30 January 2022

How a tiny European country took on China over Taiwan

 (CNN)A curious spat has unfolded in recent months between Lithuania, a small, Eastern European nation of fewer than 3 million people, and China, a superpower with an economy that could soon exceed that of the United States.

Updated 0911 GMT (1711 HKT) January 30, 2022




Taiwanese and Lithuanian flags pictured at the Taiwanese Representative Office in Vilnius, Lithuania on January 20.

It all started last year, when Lithuania poked Beijing in the eye -- twice in the space of a few months.

First, it withdrew from the so-called "17+1" group, a forum in which 17 eastern and central European countries engage with China, before encouraging others to do the same. Given China's numerous business interests in the region, most notably the so-called Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) focused on infrastructure projects, any kind of European pushback is unwelcome in Beijing.
    Then in November, Lithuania became the first country in Europe to allow self-ruled Taiwan to open a de facto embassy under the name "Taiwan." Other such offices in Europe and the United States use the name Taipei, Taiwan's capital, to avoid references that would imply the island's independence from China. Taiwan's Foreign Ministry said the opening of the Taiwanese Representative Office in Vilnius would "charter a new and promising course for bilateral relations between Taiwan and Lithuania."
      The move enraged Beijing, which saw it as an affront to its "One China" principle that insists Taiwan is part of China, rather than an independent sovereign territory, despite the two sides having been governed separately for over seven decades after a civil war. As a rule, those who want a relationship with China must recognize the policy diplomatically.

      The lobby of the Taiwanese Representative Office is pictured on November 18, 2021.

      Lithuania says the new Taiwan office does not have formal diplomatic status and does not conflict with its One China policy. But Beijing reacted by immediately downgrading diplomatic relations with Vilnius. Lithuania also claimed that China has prevented Lithuanian goods from entering China, effectively creating a trade barrier. The Chinese government has repeatedly rejected these claims, blaming Lithuania for harming China's "core interest" and sending bilateral ties to a deep freeze.
      Taiwan reacted by buying up Lithuanian produce that was destined for China -- including 20,400 bottles of rum -- and pledging to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in Lithuanian industry to support the country in the face of Chinese pressure.
      The spat has pulled in the European Union, which is backing member state Lithuania. Brussels sees Beijing's treatment of Lithuania as a threat to other EU nations, many of whom have deeper economic links with China and would like to deepen them further.
      On Thursday, the EU launched a case against China at the World Trade Organization, accusing Beijing of "discriminatory trade practices against Lithuania, which are also hitting other exports from the EU's Single Market."
      The WTO case could be just the start of the EU taking a more hardline stance on China, though there are reservations about whether doing so could prompt Beijing to retaliate in the form of trade wars or canceled investments in Europe.

      'China needs to learn lessons'

      In 1990, Lithuania became the first member of the Soviet Union to declare independence from Moscow's ruling Communist Party. It then joined the EU European Union and NATO in 2004 -- the very organization intended to be a check on socialist expansion.
      In that context, a nation like China displaying aggression in its own region, notably against Taiwan -- as well as using trade as a weapon against smaller European nations -- naturally alarms those who remember life under Soviet rule.
      "China needs to learn lessons because until now, they have been allowed to behave in a way that doesn't adhere to our values and rules, simply because they were so wealthy," Lithuania's former Prime Minister Andrius Kubilius told CNN.
      "I don't see that bigger EU countries would have taken it upon themselves to stand up. Maybe from Lithuania it will spread to others and in time, Europe will stand united against a country that doesn't meet our standards," he added.
      One of the reasons Lithuanian officials may be more comfortable than some nations in taking this stance is that China is a relatively small export market for the country. Only 1.18% of Lithuania's exports went to China in 2019 -- compared with 13.1% to Russia and 3.64% to the US -- though China is also one of Lithuania's fastest growing export markets, according to the Observatory of Economic Complexity.
      For Lithuania, this hardline stance is more than a moral mission. Officials who spoke to CNN say that by standing up to China, they also hope to send a message to Moscow.
      Velina Tchakarova, head of the Austrian Institute for European and Security Policy, explains that Lithuania has "been under permanent Russian pressure since joining NATO. Lithuania wants to set an example within the European members that no one will succumb to autocratic regimes in Beijing and Moscow."
      Lithuanian officials told CNN they hoped standing up to China might set a precedent in the EU for pushing back on autocratic regimes. One senior Lithuanian diplomat said the endgame was for Europe to have more effective anti-coercion measures.
      Brussels recently proposed a legal mechanism that would allow the EU to respond to economic intimidation in a "structured and uniform manner" by using a "tailor-made and proportional response for each situation" which could include tariffs, restricting imports and limiting access to the EU's internal market.
      But many of the smaller EU nations are privately skeptical that their fellow member states -- especially those who trade extensively with China -- would back them when push comes to shove.
      A strong economic relationship with China is a key plank of the EU's drive for "strategic autonomy," a term used in Brussels to describe the EU becoming more independent from US influences as a geopolitical power. The thinking was that by partnering with Beijing economically, Europe could act as a bridge between the US and China, while not getting squashed between the two.

      The building which houses the Taiwanese Representative Office is pictured in Vilnius in November 2021.

      Bigger member states, most notably France, have been strong supporters of the strategic autonomy drive. And while European politicians have grown increasingly uncomfortable with China's treatment of Uyghur Muslims, suppression of democracy in Hong Kong and aggression towards Taiwan, when it comes to hard cash, many European countries are not quite ready to alienate China.
      Tchakarova believes that by "bringing China into the debate, Lithuania seeks to strengthen the US position in Europe, but also to warn Brussels and key member states (Germany and France) of the potential risks and dangers associated with bilateral relations with China in the future."
      Essentially, they hope to force these countries to take a stand. So, will it work?

      A delicate balance

      Some in Lithuania think their hardline stance has already produced results. Officials point to the fact that France has backed them, along with the rest of the EU, and called on China to deescalate the situation. This is particularly significant right now, since France holds the EU's rotating presidency and is also in the middle of a presidential election campaign. Earlier this month, Slovenia announced that it too would seek to increase trade with Taiwan.
      One senior European Commission official told CNN Brussels' position is that Lithuania has not gone against its One China policy, and that if China continues to be hostile, it must provide evidence that the policy has been breached, which Lithuanian officials are chalking up as a victory.
      However, not everyone, even in Lithuania itself, thinks the strategy has been a wholesale success.
      President Gitanas Nauseda said that while he supported opening the Taiwanese Representative Office, he thinks the name was needlessly provocative and Lithuania must now deal with the "consequences."
      Beijing responded by saying acknowledging the mistake was a good start, but still believes Lithuania to have broken the One China principle.
      Brussels has been getting its act together on geopolitical matters lately. After years of bitter backbiting, it may be that Brexit and the pandemic have reminded EU leaders that unity in areas of mutual interest means even small nations like Lithuania can use the mechanics of the EU to stand up to one of the richest, most powerful nations on earth.
      Whether Lithuania's stand -- and the EU taking a stand along with it -- will result in any concessions from Beijing is another matter. A recent editorial in the outspoken nationalistic state-run tabloid Global Times issued a series of steps Lithuania must take to restore relations, and warned: "no matter what tricks they play, China will never give in half an inch on issues of principle."
      But experts agreed the only chance, however remote, of forcing any concessions from China on the issue is for Europe to present a united front.
        Benedict Rogers, a longstanding human rights campaigner and the chief executive of Hong Kong Watch, says that while "China has shown it is very adept at divide-and-rule and able to play countries off another ... when countries stand together and stand up against China together, Beijing's bullying tactics are less effective and pressure on China can have more impact."
        For all this may seem a small spat, what's at stake is years of work in which the EU has tried to find a way to reconcile its economic relationship with China with its duty to member states and its moral values. The question is for how much longer that balance can hold.

        Friday, 28 January 2022

        Latvia blasts Germany’s ‘immoral and hypocritical’ relationship with Russia and China

         Berlin’s actions are ‘driving a division line between west and east in Europe,’ says Defense Minister Artis Pabriks.


        Latvia's Defense Minister Artis Pabriks called Germany's relationship with Russia and China "immoral and hypocritical". | Gerard Cerles/AFP via Getty Images


        Latvian Defense Minister Artis Pabriks hit out against what he calls Germany’s “immoral and hypocritical” relationship with Russia and China.

        Berlin’s actions are driving a wedge between western and eastern European countries, Pabriks said in an interview with the Financial Times. As Russia masses more than 100,000 troops and military equipment at the Ukrainian border, Pabriks said the Western response has demonstrated “wishful thinking.”

        Eastern European officials have reacted in disbelief over Berlin’s refusal to send lethal weapons to Ukraine, while also refusing to grant Estonia permission to send old German howitzers to the country. So far, Germany has committed to sending 5,000 helmets and a field hospital.

        Pabriks lashed out at Germany’s stance on the howitzers — as well as some of its businesses threatening to pull out of Lithuania over the country’s dispute with China as Vilnius deepens diplomatic relations with Taiwan.

        “How are you acting yourself when it comes to Lithuania, Russia, China?” Pabriks asked. “It’s immoral and hypocritical. It’s driving a division line between west and east in Europe.”

        “Germans forgot already that Americans were granting their security in the Cold War,” The defense minister added. “But they should [remember]. It’s their moral duty,”

        https://www.politico.eu/article/latvia-germany-immoral-relationship-russia-china/




        Putin gambles Russia’s economy over Ukraine

        Moscow’s geopolitical ambitions are trumping economic concerns as Russians tighten their belts.



        UK eyes ‘biggest possible’ military support to NATO over Ukraine

        Johnson considers doubling troops near Ukraine; Truss says new sanctions are being readied.


        Tuesday, 18 January 2022

        China’s Bullying of Lithuania Spurs European Unity

        Beijing has gone to great lengths to punish Lithuania for opening a Taiwanese representative office. In the long run, China’s tactics may end up making the EU stronger and more resilient.



        When Lithuania, a Baltic country of 2.8 million people, decided last year to open a Taiwanese representative office in Vilnius and a Lithuanian one in Taiwan, China’s response was swift and draconian.

        Giving Taiwan any kind of legitimacy or status that challenged Beijing’s One China principle, which considers Taiwan an inalienable part of the mainland, would not be tolerated.

        Judy Dempsey
        Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe and editor in chief of Strategic Europe.

        So when Lithuania announced the new office would bear Taiwan’s name— rather than that of Chinese Taipei, used by other countries to avoid conflict with China—Beijing began to pile the pressure on Vilnius. Over the past few years, Lithuania has attracted lucrative investments from fellow EU member states as well as the United States. The latter strongly supports Lithuania’s criticism of China’s human rights and trade policy.

        In December 2021, Vilnius was temporarily removed from China’s customs clearance system. Earlier that year, Beijing stopped direct China-Lithuanian freight trains. It also closed credit lines for Lithuanian companies and blocked imports of existing orders from China.

        Vilnius didn’t change its stance, even when China downgraded diplomatic ties with Lithuania to chargé d’affaires level, forcing the Lithuanian ambassador to return home.

        Beijing then applied a different, stronger kind of pressure. It warned multinational companies, European and otherwise, to reduce their investments in Lithuania and stop sourcing supplies in the country. Beijing even threatened to retaliate against these companies’ operations in China—a well-tested policy aimed at playing EU member states off against each other.

        At first, the German Chamber of Commerce in the Baltic States warned the Lithuanian government about the economic consequences of opening a Taiwanese representation office. German companies bringing goods from China to Lithuania and vice versa would face big difficulties.

        But the Federation of German Industries (BDI), which has taken a very tough stance against China’s economic policies and human rights policies, often in contrast to the previous and current government in Berlin, was much more critical. Beijing’s actions amounted to a “trade boycott.”

        “This is about the weaponization of trade. This is about the weaponization of European value chains,” Žygimantas Pavilionis, the Lithuanian parliament’s foreign affairs expert, told Strategic Europe. “It’s no longer just a bilateral issue. It’s a European one. It needs a European solution,” he added.

        One could be on its way. It’s called the Anti-Coercion Instrument (ACI), presented by the European Commission on December 8, 2021. In a nutshell, the instrument “is a response to the rising problem of economic coercion and aims to protect the Union’s and Member States’ interests and sovereign choices.”

        In clear language, the Commission also warns that “as a last resort, when the economic coercion persists, the Union may consider taking countermeasures against the country in question in order to counter act such economic coercion.”

        The ACI has been on the Commission’s desk for some time. “The impetus grew under the Trump administration,” said Theresa Fallon, founder and director of the Centre for Russia Europe Asia Studies.

        Former U.S. president Donald Trump not only took a hard line against China’s trade, economic, and political policies. He also threatened Germany and other EU countries with sanctions if Berlin didn’t stop the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project. According to Fallon, “The EU’s proposed anti-coercion instrument will be designed to protect the EU from various forms of economic coercion, not only from Beijing, but also from Washington and Moscow.”

        One can only imagine the strains on the transatlantic relationship if the ACI was applied to the United States, particularly over its continued threat to impose sanctions on German and other European companies involved in completing Nord Stream 2.

        Leaving aside the ACI and China’s weaponization of European trade in attempt to force Lithuania to change its Taiwan policy, Beijing’s actions have exposed the vulnerability of the EU’s trade and security policy.

        The bloc’s trade is dependent on the Chinese economy, not to mention the global supply chains so dominated by Beijing.

        “Beijing has shown us what they are capable of by threatening to impose sanctions on EU member states that have Lithuania products in their value chains,” Fallon said. “The only correct response to this threat is to decrease dependence, build resilience, and invest in future technologies in the EU. The Commission cannot carry on with business as usual.”

        That, of course, is easier said than done. In practice, it would require a major EU strategic shift. Pavilionis and other Lithuanian officials are pinning their hopes on the French presidency of the Council of the EU. They want President Emmanuel Macron to hold an EU 27+1 summit that should set out a united European stance toward China. And Lithuania, which pulled out of the 17+1 format, a group for China’s engagement with many countries in Central Europe and the Western Balkans, would like to see the demise of that particular divisive venture.

        By forcing Europe to diversify supply chains, China’s weaponization of European value chains may end up boosting the EU’s Indo-Pacific strategy and strengthening France’s growing strategic, military, and economic presence in the region. Such are the unintended consequences of China’s bullying tactics towards Lithuania. “Chinese diplomacy is backfiring,” Fallon said.

        But don’t expect China to give up such tactics overnight.

        https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/86208


        Most Recent Post

        Man charged for borrowing rare Chinese manuscripts from UCLA library, returning fakes

          Suspect Jeffrey Ying allegedly travelled to China after checking works out using several aliases Agence France-Presse Published: 12:11pm, ...

        Popular Posts - Last 30 days